What kind of future do smart/intelligent women want?
…so I watched this three-part vid…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb-1WJ3mliY&fmt=18
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha6ZJRoJwFk&fmt=18
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buaooE_3IIM&fmt=18
…and one of the messages I got was: now that women have equality in society, they’re looking to marry for love/compatibility and not so much for financial stability anymore.
If all the smart/intelligent/career-driven women somehow matched-up with their likewise men…and if they drove lesser males and females into some sort of extinction or, at least, minority, would this world eventually be run by women?…with men basically serving “support- or mate-type” roles `for` those women? I’m not talking about feminism or femi-nazism…but this, to me, almost seems like an alternate reality…like an episode of Sliders or something.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sliders)
What do you guys think?
Caffeinated Content


June 20th, 2009 at 9:02 am
Create a video blog
If you look at the birth rates of both genders, you will see that less and less males are being born. Eventually, the male gender WILL be a minority.
We’ve found a way to fertilize a woman’s egg with a different woman’s egg, and the fetus is always female.
Maybe when males are wiped out, we will finally experience world peace.
Edit -
Yudel, I thought I told you to kill yourself?
June 21st, 2009 at 11:00 pm
Create a video blog…instantly.
Why would that happen? If the smart/whatever women were with the equivalent men, and if they drove the others into extinction (not going to happen, career-type people tend to breed less, and stupid people can’t handle birth control and breed more), then why would it be controlled by women? Surely it would be controlled by the smart women and their equivalent-level men? Or do you think the smart/intelligent/career-driven men would let themselves be controlled and only become support/mates? I don’t think that would happen.
Harriet
June 24th, 2009 at 12:07 am
Caffeinated Content
I didn’t watch the videos on youtube but: both of my parents, were factory workers. I personally had two jobs to support my own College expenses, don’t owe anything to anybody and have two Masters under my belt. I have been always, very career oriented and did it on my own since I moved out of my parent’s home at 18. My siblings, all graduated from High School but made different choices for themselves. Did I try to “match up with a likewise man?” Yes, I did. When I got finally married at 29, I had my own bank account and at 30, I had a child. Am I a feminist? Yes, but I’m not a “female pig chauvinist” nor do I insult men for “the heck of it”. I believe, it all depends how and where you grew up ! How much of respect and values have been taught to you on an early age. I have never lowered my expectations professionally and if you work it out, work hard on your persona, you can pretty much accomplish anything in life !!
June 27th, 2009 at 10:51 am
Kansieo.com
Wow, I love Clo’s answer ! Smart and intelligent women succeed only, because they believe in themselves and they do want better choices in their life ! Working hard, is the secret !
June 28th, 2009 at 8:23 am
Caffeinated Content
“women with high achieving careers are less likely to have children”
Perhaps because they are having a career instead of pregnancy and mother hood?
DUH!
and why is marriage being discussed when its on the chopping block soon to be extinct?
June 30th, 2009 at 4:18 pm
love compatibility
matriarchy
July 2nd, 2009 at 5:03 am
Create a video blog
I didn’t watch the youtube thing yet, but I will in a bit. My answer is a resounding, “NO.” The same people that always have run the world –the power elite — the fat cat, greedy ******* bankers, industrialist and the old money aristocracy. It’s not a club they let the nouveau riche join. The “progressives don’t give birth at a rate to even sustain their population, as someone else pointed out. Basically, when a culture dominates and has it too good for too long, the average citizens become complacent and are less interested in empire building than they are in hedonism, that is when the society collapses under it’s own weight. Though for various reasons throughout history, people put a priority on the good life, and fail to bear enough offspring. They do not have the population base of males to support their expansionism and they are overrun. The countries of the empires still exist, there are still people who live there, but it is a different culture and different genetic lines found therein. Guess who still controls the country though? They care nothing for us peons, and are so pleased when the little people fight amongst themselves. The west is doomed to an ignominious defeat at the hands of those who think they can do things better. The Bolsheviks thought they could make things soooo much better, but look what happened. The ***** thought they could make a new Germanic empire, that didn’t work out either. The Roman and Greek empires eventually failed partly on the above reasons. Long histories of warfare tend to destroy societies also, e.g. the Spartans. They ran out of citizens, because of their belicose ideology. Our culture will end because of brainless morons like the first poster that I would assume is a *******? Doesn’t like men, apparently would like an all female world. I could be wrong but that’s what it seems like to me.
July 5th, 2009 at 6:49 am
Caffeinated Content
Just because women aren’t looking for financial support from men as much anymore, it doesn’t mean that men are looking for financial support from women. I expect and hope for a completely equitable future.
July 5th, 2009 at 1:12 pm
love compatibility
Huh????
Why would smart/intelligent/career-driven women being matched up with their likewise men end up with the world being run by women???
I would like a future where neither *** dominates and all individuals have the opportunity to pursue their interests/goals. I think that no reasonable person, man or woman, would find fault with that.